Search for: "Robin S Ramirez" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Ramirez (“Ramirez”), holding that all plaintiffs, to include absent class members, must demonstrate that they have suffered a concrete harm in order to have Article III standing to sue for damages. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:04 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
They may also serve as a gauge for the high court’s inclination toward elaborating on its 2016 decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 10:58 am by Amy Howe
Robins that the Constitution requires a concrete injury, Kagan stressed. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ramirez, the named plaintiff, shared the same name as a restricted person. [read post]